“Why everyone hates Malaparte” an article by Adam Thirlwell in The Guardian


“In his youth, Malaparte was a fascist. Then he fell out with Mussolini and was sent into internal exile. After the intercession of Mussolini’s son-in-law, Galeazzo Ciano, he was freed in 1938 – but was repeatedly rearrested. As a war correspondent for the Corriere della Sera, he covered the axis powers on the eastern front, and then the liberation of Italy. After the war he moved to Paris, where his politics became communist. Before he died in 1957, he was rather tempted by Maoism.

Usually people think that, to be original, you have to be a revolutionary. You have to think in a way that people don’t normally think. But Malaparte offers a wilder example. First, you don’t think like other people. Then you have to not think like yourself. You have to become a counter-revolutionary. This is what the life of Malaparte represents: an antimodern modern; a reactionary liberal”

From the 2009 Guardian article by Adam Thirlwell, – read the complete article, linked here.


We encourage you to let us know what you think! Fateci sapere cosa ne pensate!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s